tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13786279.post114761993739169112..comments2023-12-28T17:22:20.888+00:00Comments on Wenlock: Stephenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12816256676376213859noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13786279.post-1147718671999459402006-05-15T19:44:00.000+01:002006-05-15T19:44:00.000+01:00OT, entirely: I just stole a quote from you to pas...OT, entirely: I just stole a quote from you to paste in my blog.Katehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02495558736099438348noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13786279.post-1147633721727666422006-05-14T20:08:00.000+01:002006-05-14T20:08:00.000+01:00Hehe, I'm revising my Mediaeval story, market or n...Hehe, I'm revising my Mediaeval story, market or no market. And it's not romance, it's epic, so I'm going to submit it. If I don't find a taker I can always publish it on my blog. It's not going to stay in the drawer once I've finished whipping the bugger into shape. :)Gabriele Campbellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17205770868139083575noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13786279.post-1147628680153855252006-05-14T18:44:00.000+01:002006-05-14T18:44:00.000+01:00"it was enough for me to establish that while I wa..."it was enough for me to establish that while I wanted the stories told, I wasn't enjoying trying to tell them."<BR/><BR/>I think this is something that a lot of writers learn as they go along. Reading and writing are two different things, and something that brings pleasure from reading isn't always the same as something that brings pleasure when writing.<BR/><BR/>As for the article in the Herald, it was an example of (and I quote) "literary schlock to obliterate all taste and sensibility." Factually inaccurate, it wallowed in the cliches of fifty years ago, instead of presenting a well informed view of romantic fiction today. It was a missed opportunity for some serious and relevant journalism.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com